Saturday, February 1, 2014

Homework 4 notes and videos.

Here are some videos that address questions people were having about off-center hybridized states and related matters on HW4. One key thing to realize is that if you do not have states of different symmetry, then you cannot make off-center states (hybrids). Without the radial state, \(\psi_{200} \), one would not be able to make off-center states from the x, y and z states. Regarding symmetry, the radial state is not changed by any rotation. The x, y and z states, on the other hand are invariant only with respect to rotation around one axis (the one in their name), and thus have a different symmetry.



Regarding the coefficients of the in plane states in problem 5, I should have mentioned in the video that because of the \(\sqrt{1/3} \) coefficient of the \(\psi_{200} \) state, the x and y coefficients squared have to add up to 2/3. That is a consequence of the normalization constraint on the hybrid state. So there is that, and also that the ratio of the coefficients must be \(\sqrt{3} \) due to a 30 degree angle. It is in the video.





Regarding the sp3 states, I think that they will all have to have a z coefficient that is negative (to get 109 degrees away from the "starter" state, which is given and along the z axis, and further, those coefficients must all be the same, by symmetry. Does that make sense? I think they are each sqrt(1/12). So will that realization, you then have a -sqrt(1/12) coefficient on the z state and a -sqrt(1/4) coefficient on the 200 state. Square and added together, that is 1/3 I think. So I believe the x and y coefficients for the other 3 states can then be the same as the were for sp2. This will splay the states out in just the right way I believe.

9 comments:

  1. Thanks for the vids Zack!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I tried a similar method for problem 6, but i calculated that I for x and y were the same, however for z they were different. Also for this the second video, how do we know that we have to go 120 degrees? Is it because sp2 states are 120 degrees? In which case for problem 6, does that mean that the angle is 109.5?

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you very much for these videos. For the first one, did you get the equation for the expectation value of x in the very first line by just foiling out Psi_A? Wouldn't that introduce an extra factor of two in the cross term, or did that cancel out somewhere?

    ReplyDelete
  6. hey zack I am having trouble with finding coefficients with the sp3 states in problem 6, I am confused with what axis the bonding angle is associated with?

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I did not realize there was such a state as sp4. Can you please elaborate on that, please? Thanks.

    ReplyDelete